'owner' or 'all' at the end of group urls?

[ewinslow]

e.g.: /bookmarks/group/$guid/owner

This seems gratuitous?

[cash]

what if we added another page for bookmarks (take blog archives as an example)? Maybe group members "like" bookmarks and we display a page the most liked at /bookmarks/group/$guid/liked

[ewinslow]

/bookmarks/liked/$guid?

[cash]

But that prevents you from doing /bookmarks/liked/ewinslow which you may like more than /bookmarks/liked/456574

Do we really want to give up this flexibility to make the group URLs a little shorter?

[ewinslow]

It's not about having a shorter url so much as removing gratuitous information from the url. How about this?

/bookmarks/group/12345
/bookmarks/group/12345/liked

or, if you prefer,

/bookmarks/group/12345/all
/bookmarks/group/12345/liked

At least this is consistent with the site-level urls (i.e. /bookmarks/all, /bookmarks/liked)

[cash]

I think you just made my point in the last comment. The second set of URLs is exactly what I'm trying to do. I'm not a fan of leaving off the last segment because at times we have changed the default page (should it be all or should it owner). When we make the change, people who have bookmarked the all page suddenly end up on the owner page.

[ewinslow]

That's fair.

In that case what I'm saying is that "all" is a better name than "owner" ^_.

[cash]

Since we're publishing plugin guidelines soon we should make a decision.

I chose 'owner' because that is what is used for users. I can see the use of 'all' because it does display all of a group's stuff.

Get your votes in now!

[cash]

This needs to be decided now.

[brettp]

All.

[cash]

(In [svn:9133]) Fixes #3138 using 'all' for group listing urls