New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document how to use egef_metadata/relationships() to get entities without specified MD/relationship. (Trac #3046) #3046
Comments
cash wrote on 41418362-05-04 Easy to do but will it be used by enough people to justify the addition of at least four functions (entities, relationships, metadata, annotations)? Feedback welcome from anyone on this. |
ewinslow wrote on 41500311-06-12 I think it'd be better for now to just write up some documentation on what the SQL clauses should be for those who want to acheive this. I'd certainly like to know! |
brettp wrote on 41502173-04-25 Metadata (denormalize in code to make your life easier):
Relationships:
|
brettp wrote on 42321985-08-31 I don't think there's enough of a use case to merit adding the new functions. Documentation above egef_metadata() and egef_relationship() should suffice. |
Milestone changed to |
Title changed from |
…t have metadata or relationships
Original ticket http://trac.elgg.org/ticket/3046 on 41181991-06-11 by trac user jtilson, assigned to unknown.
Elgg version: 1.7
It would be great if we had a function that could grab entities without a particular set of metadata, or entities that don't have a given relationship. While it's understood that this can be achieved by using custom joins and wheres, it'd be even nicer if there was a wrapper function for these situations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: